Introduction
Clinical experiences are paramount to nurse anesthesia resident (NAR) education. The Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs (COA), responsible to accredit all nurse anesthesia programs (NAP), states that for students entering healthcare professions today, simulation-based education will be a growing and continued part of their education from entry to practice, to part of their ongoing professional education, and potentially some component of their certification or recertification process or staff credentialing, just as it has evolved in other high-hazard/high reliability professions.1 Per the COA, each NAR is required to complete a specific number of clinical cases, experiences, and hours, along with the required didactic education before NARs can apply for boards. The COA requirements are essential to developing NARs into successful anesthesia providers. Simulation, didactic education, and clinical experiences are main components to this development. Creating clinical readiness utilizing simulation experiences and didactic education is an important factor in preparing and training NARs.
Clinical readiness contributing to clinical success has been evaluated in several fields, including within the military setting, to both develop and assess knowledge, skills, and abilities to be successful in a wartime mission.2 Clinical readiness was recently assessed in a qualitative descriptive review by Tubog et al3 with Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) clinical coordinators and NARs. The authors found that strong simulation experiences promote clinical readiness and stated that simulation training is the cornerstone for nurse anesthesia education because it teaches psychomotor skills prior to hands on patient care.3 The use of simulation experiences has been strongly supported in both the nursing and medical professions to create clinical success.
Simulation can be performed using high-fidelity simulation scenarios with tasked rubric clinical skills to help develop the NAR’s clinical readiness. Several studies have demonstrated that experience in anesthesia training in a simulated environment before patient encounters can improve procedural efficiency, decrease error rates, and positively affects quality care and patient safety.4 Simulation allows the replication of anesthesia care in a safe learning environment that is beneficial to develop NARs, particularly uncovering and addressing unsafe or inefficient aspects of the anesthesia care.5 Clinical readiness, simulation, and clinical experiences are main components in developing the success of NARs. Anesthesiology-specific simulation training improves knowledge, skill, task completion time, and behavioral processes.6 Creating focused simulation and clinical scenarios for NARs will help to prepare them for clinical readiness and clinical success. Carefully designed and implemented simulation education sessions can be advantageous in preparing NARs for residency rotations.7 Research supports utilizing simulation to develop successful NARs for the clinical setting.
The development of competency-based education (CBE) in nursing further supports the focus on simulation and clinical readiness. CBE provides learners with personalized support for their learning needs, meaningful assessments, and measurable objectives so the learner can apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities toward current and future educational needs.8 CBE has many guiding principles that follow the themes of simulation and clinical readiness for NAR clinical success. Greenwood and Ledvina9 emphasized the obligation to ensure that trainees can demonstrate fundamental standards of care from the minute they begin interacting with patients. By analyzing the historical importance of clinical experiences for NARs, utilizing CBE, and applying the current evidence on simulation and clinical readiness, an improved educational model can be developed to promote clinical readiness and success for NARs.
An integrated NAP located in the Midwest region, founded in 2017 with graduation of the first cohort of NARs in 2020, experienced a sudden rise in the need for clinical practica remediation among 2 different NAR cohorts at various clinical sites. This resulted in the removal of NARs from the clinical environment, conduction of a root cause analysis of the issue by NAP administration and faculty, and the development of interventions to promote NAR success in clinical practica. The integrated design of this NAP is intended to provide NARs with fundamental knowledge of anesthesia pharmacology, anesthesia basic principles, and essential anesthesia skills prior to entering clinical practica. Essential anesthesia skills include preoperative evaluation concepts, anesthesia machine basics and monitoring modalities, airway principles, positioning, application of certain types of anesthetics for specific surgical cases, basic principles of fluid and blood administration, basics of regional anesthesia, understanding the postoperative course for surgical patients, and developing basic care ranges for patients in extreme ages. These concepts are introduced during didactics and reinforced during deliberate practice over the course of 11 months prior to the start of clinical practica. Following the start of clinical practica, NARs simultaneously continue didactic studies with advanced anesthesia principles content.
The root cause analysis of the increased need for clinical practica remediation exposed opportunities for improvement in the deliverance of anesthesia content within the anesthesia basic principles course. Notable deficiencies and opportunities for improvement included: (1) NARs had minimal simulation training with faculty before the administration of simulation competency evaluation rubrics; (2) one cohort’s simulation training was not evaluated at any point in time with a simulation competency rubric before entering the clinical practica environment; (3) Year 3 NARs were relied upon to train Year 1 NARs using simulation experiences resulting in training deficiencies; and (4) an unsuccessful trial with one cohort to primarily observe anesthesia care 1 day per week for 6 weeks prior to completion of essential anesthesia didactic content and simulation experiences.
Following the root cause analysis, NAP faculty designed interventions to promote NAR success in clinical practica, including: (1) restructuring the anesthesia basic principles course, (2) creation of standardized rubrics, and (3) provision of deliberate practice opportunities. The anesthesia basic principles course was restructured to enhance the clinical preparation of NARs. Clinical Practica I-III in this NAP correlate with didactics in the anesthesia basics principles course. NARs requiring clinical remediation specifically struggled with the expectations of Clinical Practica I, II, and III. Tables 1-3 provide details of the NAP expectations of each of these clinical practica.
Deliberate practice is an engagement in structural activities created specifically to improve performance in a domain.10 Providing deliberate practice opportunities for the NARs in this NAP created a structured and safe environment to practice core anesthesia skills prior to evaluation. It provided NARs with the benefit of faculty involvement, opportunity to receive feedback, participation in peer-to-peer learning, and an overall increased time in simulation training. Faculty involvement allowed immediate feedback to be given to NARs with the opportunity for correction. Peer-to-peer learning provided benefits to both Year 3 and Year 1 NARs as teaching others solidifies knowledge and retention within a supportive environment.
Framework
Promoting NAR success in clinical practica through restructuring the anesthesia basic principles course, creation of standardized rubrics, and providing deliberate practice was accomplished through the pedagogical framework of CBE as it provides necessary elements for NAR success in the clinical environment. The American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) defines CBE as a system of instruction, assessment, feedback, self-reflection, and academic reporting that is based on demonstration of a student’s knowledge, attitudes, motivations, self-perceptions, and skills expected as they progress through their education.11 The AACN’s 2021 Essentials emphasizes the importance and benefits of CBE.11 The basic principles of this framework create a set of expectations that focus on outcomes through demonstrating and assessing several methods by different assessors as a learner progresses to mastery of content and skills. The structure of CBE allows the learner to serve as an active participant in the assessment processes.
In this NAP, NARs gathered and reviewed performance evidence with various faculty members during the basic principles course to help achieve the defined student learning outcomes (SLO). Creation of standardized rubrics and integration of deliberate practice sessions within the basic principles course has followed a main guiding principle within CBE of progression to mastery with frequent formative feedback. Core principles for CBE assessments are outlined by the AACN and have been implemented within the NAP course revision.11 These AACN CBE core principles include multiple points, assessors and methods, active learner engagement, direct observation, and frequent formative feedback prior to summative evaluation.11 The principles of CBE were utilized extensively within the basic principles course revision to aid with NARs clinical competency success.
Learning Environment
Revision of the anesthesia basic principles course involved creation and incorporation of simulation experiences for essential anesthesia skill development in NARs, the use of standardized rubrics for both formative and summative evaluation, and development of new SLOs. Formative evaluation of essential anesthesia skill development occurred during the entire semester of the anesthesia basic principles course with various faculty and senior NARs. The summative evaluation of essential anesthesia skills was completed at the end of the semester by faculty who utilized the standardized rubric. Updated SLOs included language addressing: (1) performance of a proper preoperative anesthesia evaluation, (2) understanding the application of certain types of anesthetics used for specific cases, (3) reviewing the basics of the anesthesia machine and monitoring modalities used in the care of the anesthetized patient, (4) applying the principles of airway and anesthetic management, (5) demonstrating proper positioning of the surgical patient, (6) applying the basic principles of fluid and blood administration, as well as electrolytes and arterial blood gas analysis, (7) exploring the basics of regional anesthesia with application of ultrasonography, (8) understanding the basic care of patients at the extremes of age, and (9) demonstrating an understanding of the post-operative course and pain management. The updated SLOs aligned components of CBE within the anesthesia basic principles course revision.
The course revision occurred over 2 phases. During the initial phase of revision, simulation experiences and standardized rubrics were created for: (1) preoperative anesthesia assessment, (2) standard general anesthesia induction, (3) rapid sequence general anesthesia induction, (4) standard anesthesia cart set up, (5) anesthesia machine checkout, (6) epidural placement, and (7) spinal placement (see Tables 4 - 10). The textbooks Miller’s Anesthesia12 and Nurse Anesthesia13 were the primary content resources utilized in the development of the standardized rubrics which included evaluation criteria, quality definitions, and a scoring matrix. The NAP faculty and administration received input from clinical practica experiences to aid in design and standardization of the rubrics. These experiences were gathered from practicing, expert CRNAs to assist in the real-life anesthesia flow of the essential anesthesia skills detailed in the rubrics. The rubrics were created using evaluation criteria, quality definitions, and a scoring strategy.
The standardized rubrics were available to NARs at the start of the anesthesia basic principles course and deliberate practice sessions were provided throughout the semester to promote development and success with the identified essential anesthesia skills. An 84% was required on each standardized rubric during summative evaluation prior to entry into clinical practica. The standardized rubrics included a designated time limit for NARs to finish each procedure or skill for the summative skill evaluation. A 5% grade reduction was assigned on the standardized rubric for exceeding the designated time limits of specific essential anesthesia skills (See Figures 4-10).
The second phase of revision, implemented with the following cohort, increased the simulation content and standardized rubric evaluations in the anesthesia basic principles course to include: (1) emergence from general anesthesia, (2) Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) anesthesia report format to be provided in the post-anesthesia care unit, and (3) generalized peripheral nerve block (see Figures 11-13). In this phase NAP faculty offered weekly proctored deliberate practice and Year 3 NARs were invited to participate in peer-to-peer learning with Year 1 NARs.
Results
Commencing with the anesthesia basics principles course instructional revision, all NARs have successfully remained in the clinical environment and are meeting Clinical Practica I, II, and III expectations (see Tables 1-3) for the past 3 cohorts. Three cohorts have completed the revised anesthesia basic principles course and there has been significantly less clinical practica concerns related to NAR clinical performance at the NAP’s clinical locations. Every NAR has successfully remained in the clinical setting for Clinical Practica I, II, or III following the revision of the anesthesia basic principles course.
Discussion
Utilization of the CBE framework, introduction of standardized rubrics, and provision of deliberate practice sessions covering essential anesthesia skills during the revision of the anesthesia basic principles course has produced successful clinical experiences within this NAP. Based on the feedback from clinical sites, NARs have continued to meet and exceed the clinical expectations of Clinical Practica I, II, and III (see Tables 1-3). The NAP has received positive qualitative feedback from clinical site preceptors via direct communication and on NAR clinical daily evaluations. Each cohort is continuing to improve and exceed clinical practica expectations.
Effective learning occurs when NARs are given explicit instructions, offered deliberate practice sessions, and are supervised by faculty to allow individualized identification of errors, informative feedback, and remedial training.2 It is incumbent on faculty to organize the sequence of appropriate training tasks and monitor improvement to decide when transitions to more complex and challenging tasks are appropriate.2 Revision of the NAP faculty approach to educating NARs through the use of the CBE framework, addition of increased deliberate practice, introduction of standardized rubrics for summative evaluation with a minimum required score, and peer-to-peer learning has improved NAR clinical readiness, creating a successful transition to the clinical environment for NARs and promoting adherence to COA’s accrediting requirements.